Preparations for the local council elections due on 8 April 2008 were
impregnated with many obstacles, starting from the problems of nomination,
proceeding to the arrests and storming of homes of many members of the MB
Group, which is the largest opposition group. The difference was clear between
52,000 candidates of the ruling NDP compared with 20 Islamist candidates.
Local and international remarks:
The Maat Center for Jurist and Constitutional
Studies published a report prepared by Abdul Nasser Qandil discussing the
violations and excesses that were made in the elections. The report includes
the Maat mission of creating new forms of control that support the views
calling for the activation of the role of the civil society organizations in
keeping a watch on the elections and reveals the aspects of excesses that may
be committed during the electoral process whether deliberately or not. At the
same time, it represents the form of control with all the objectivity that is
inherent in it and that replies to those who cast doubt on the benefit that
could be reaped from the electoral process.
The Human Rights Watch has declared that the campaign of arrests
launched by the government in the ranks of the Islamists before the local
council elections was an “open” attempt to rig the elections. It should be
recalled that the Egyptian authorities arrested 800 members of the MB Group, which
is the largest opposition movement in Egypt, without making charges
against them. These included 150 persons who should have nominated themselves
to run for the elections.
The Muslim Brotherhood [MB] Group:
A total of 20 members of the MB Group managed to nominate themselves
for the local council elections amid charges made by the opposition forces and
the MB Group against the ruling NDP that it was placing obstacles in the way of
those who were seeking to nominate hemselves for the local council elections.
The MB Group did not exclude the possibility of appealing the results of the
local council elections in view of the continuation of the campaign of arrests.
Well over 5,000 MB candidates, who were excluded by the competent
authorities, secured court orders binding the government autrhorities to
register them in the lists of candidates. However, none of them could enforce
the judicial order issued in his favor. The security services pursued MB
elements in several Egyptian cities and villages in a bellicose atmosphere in
which the government forces sought to stop the MB candidates from running for
elections. The security authorities have in fact succeeded in stopping the MB
candidates from nominating themselves in these elections. The MB Group said that
its candidates will run for elections from inside their prisons.
The ruling National Democratic Party [NDP]:
The ruling National Democratic Party [NDP] denied charges that it was
in control of the lists of candidates or that it was seeking to win all the seats
of the local councils. It said that it wanted all parties to participate in the
competition. It said that it expected that the number of winners by acclaim
would not be more than 30 to 35 per cent of the total number of seats in the
governorates. The ruling NDP nominated 52,000 candidates in all Egyptian cities
where NDP candidates won by acclaim because there were no opposition candidates
to compete with them.
The Opposition:
The number of the candidates of the opposition political parties
totaled 1,050, including 600 candidates of the Wafd liberal party, 230
candidates of the leftist National Progressive Unionist Grouping Party, 170
candidates of the Arab Nasserite Party, and 28 candidates of the new Jabhah
[Front] Party. As for the small parties which do not have a popular base, they
nominated a small number of candidates, i.e. the Egyptian Socialist Arab Party
nominated 18 candidates all of whom were competing in the three governorates of
Cairo, Alexandria
and al-Daqhaliyah. As for the El Salam Party, which is headed by Ahmad
al-Fusali, and which is facing numerous problems, it nominated one candidate,
Ibrahim abdul Mun’im, who occupies the post of secretary general of the party.
Among the parties that decided to boycott the elections was the World Peace
Party.
Importance of the local elections:
The power of the local councils stems from a constitutional amendment
that was introduced in 2005 requiring any independent candidate for the post of
president of the republic to secure by acclaim the support of 65 elected
members of the People’s Assembly, 25 Shura Council members, al council members.
The ruling NDP controls 99 per cent of the local council seats while the
remaining seats are occupied by the Wafd party, the Progressive National
Unionist Grouping Party, and the Nasserite Arab Party.
Party elections:
The General Congress of the leftist opposition Progressive National
Unionist Grouping Party re-elected its president Rif’at El Sa’id as president
of the party for a new four-year term after winning over his competitor, former
parliament deputy abu-al-Izz El Hariri by a rate of 72 per cent, i.e. El Sa’id
won 422 votes while El Hariri won 169.
The problems of nomination:
Throughout the month of March, the
nomination process was encountered by a series of problems and complications in
the various Egyptian governorates. The problems were generated by the refusal
of the competent committees to accept the nomination application and other
administrative obstacles placed in the way of the opposition